1514 The Ottoman sultan, Selim – a Sunni – defeats the Shah of Iran
OTTOMAN SULTAN SELIM I AND SAFAVID SHAH
ISMAIL I
[In Muslim opinion, the Ottomans' right to rule rested on their success in war
against the Christians and on their implementing the Holy Law in their lands. But
this did not entitle them to dominate other Sunni Muslim states and when
Ottoman arms first attempted to overthrow rival Muslim rulers throughout Asia
Minor, religious resistance developed. In 1502 the threat increased when the
head of the Safavid family, Ismail, proclaimed himself shah and quickly built an
empire directly to the east of the Ottoman frontier. Ismail's success depended on
his followers' belief that his descent (probably fictitious) from Muhammad's sonin-law
`Ali made him the true and only legitimate successor to the Prophet. Such
a claim implied that all other Muslim rulers were usurpers, including the Ottoman
sultans. This doctrine was especially explosive because large numbers of people
in Asia Minor were predisposed to accept such an idea. For generations a semisecret
Shi`ite propaganda had taught that the rulers of Islam were all illegitimate,
and that the true head of the Muslim community, the Imam, would appear
someday to overthrow the mighty and set all things right. Ismail's meteoric career
seemed to match such expectations, and the many views which had developed
about how and when the Imam would manifest himself tended to coalesce
around his person. Sultan Selim I responded to this challenge by resorting to
terror against those in his domains suspected of sympathizing with Shah Ismail.
He massacred many thousands in eastern Asia Minor and then marched on
Tabriz, Ismail's new capital. Selim's Ottoman forces defeated Ismail and his army
at Chaldiran (1514) and occupied Tabriz, but could not hold it because the town
was too far from Constantinople. The result was a stand-off, each ruler remaining
supreme within his own frontiers. Before the battle of Chaldiran, Selim and Ismail
exchanged a number of letters. The two of these letters translated below are not
dated, but were probably written sometime in 1514. Ismail's letter, apparently the
only one he wrote, came in reply to three Selim had written, one of which is
translated below. The letters were, in fact, a form of propaganda. Selim set out to
defend his right to rule by quoting from the Quran and alluding to examples from
history which buttressed his claims. Ismail, who based his claims on heredity,
had no need of such leaming; rather he quotes from seemingly contemporary
Persian poetry and appears almost casual, if not insolent, in addressing his rival.]
No comments:
Post a Comment